Sohee wrote:I'm sure there's reason for this or that setup. It's supposed to be suggestive. And it is.
But not all of us go around thinking "sex shot!" because of it.
Of course not. And I certainly don't think that way with every picture they put on their photobooks, even if they're using their looks to sell a bunch of books at the end of the day. I just hate that mentality when people pretend it is not suggestive AT ALL and that you're the one who's a pervet for even mentioning it, especially when pictures can get very suggestive.
JonCC" wrote:Wow, you really put a lot of thought into this.
Not sure wether you're being sarcastic or not. If it makes things any different, I'm a straight female who has no sexual pleasure in women's bodies. I have been trained to think as a marketeer and understand people's thoughts/behaviour in order to influence them (among other things). If you want to feel it's innocent and live in your own bubble, up to you. But don't go telling others it's in their head.
Now I understand it sounds like we're both arguing for the both extremes. Just to be clear, I don't think every picture is a sex shot, but I don't think it's as innocent as you make it out to be either. You already agreed that it is suggestive, it's not difficult to be in agreement here.
resop2 wrote:And, that's not even mentioning the infamous photobook that Yaguchi Mari shot in Vietnam ...
Thank you. Now you got me all curious about it because I haven't seen that one.