Fan Content, Art, and Media

[boinsie]

From Suzuki Airi, Suu-san dressed in C-ute's LALALA Shiawase no Uta and Dance de Bakoon! outfits~

[Zunu]

The fact that Airi has absolutely no artistic skills in the slightest makes Suu-san even more endearing.

[Celedam]

Stylistic consistency is its own skill. If you can look at a work and recognize the artist, then she is doing something right.

[SaebaRyo]

Airi actually does have some artistic skill.
C-ute Days (Mai Satoda portrait)


UTB 188

[boinsie]

She was drawing Yajima recently, too.



And more See-san outfits, etc.

[Zunu]

Stylistic consistency is its own skill. If you can look at a work and recognize the artist, then she is doing something right.

Not really. Consistently bad handwriting is still bad. A consistently flat singing voice is still flat. A consistently annoying Haruka-basher is still annoying. Someone's consistently wack fanfic is still wack.

Regardless, I'll concede that some types of consistency take skill. And that Airi is not "absolutely" devoid of talent. That was a exaggeration, and exaggeratin is bad, mkay?

[Celedam]

"Bad" (and all synonyms thereof) is subjective. Consistency is not.

What makes handwriting bad? If it's a squiggly mess that absolutely no one can decipher, then yeah, that's bad, but it's probably also inconsistent. If it's at least consistent, however, then a spouse / assistant / whatever can learn to read it. And that consistency takes some kind of skill.

I'd parse your other examples in the same way, but I don't have time right now. You get the idea.

[Starra]

Not really. Consistently bad handwriting is still bad. A consistently flat singing voice is still flat. A consistently annoying Haruka-basher is still annoying. Someone's consistently wack fanfic is still wack.

I feel like all of those statements apply to me .

[Amped]

Fuku-chan's drawing

[Amped]